Common Sense Understandings and Social Psychological Theories
Name
Institution
Instructor
Course
Date
Social Psychology
Common Sense Understandings and Social Psychological Theories
One difference between common sense understandings and social psychological theories is the involvement of scholarly research (Gilovich, Chen, Keltner, & Nisbett, 2016). Common sense understandings involve common knowledge and social perspectives where else social psychological theories involve the use of education and research to provide information on different phenomena (Gilovich et al., 2016). Social psychological theories are based on scientific research supported with evidence from the research process and past results. For individuals to apply these theories, they must have background information relating to the theories (Gilovich et al., 2016). Social psychological theories are tested to ensure they are accurate in their application where else common sense understandings are based on the individual’s perspectives and values (Gilovich et al., 2016). Social psychological theories may involve an analysis of the human behavior. An example of this can be based on the association of human beings with other groups that they are able to relate to (Gilovich et al., 2016).
Another difference between common sense understandings and social psychological theories are derived from educational platforms where else common sense understandings are passed down from one generation to another or from person to person (Gilovich et al., 2016). This means that social psychological theories are more accurate than common sense understandings as they have been tested to prove their accuracy but common sense understandings cannot be tested or changed to increase their accuracy and provide a limited understanding of phenomena (Gilovich et al., 2016). An example of this difference is in eating where common sense understanding requires individuals to follow the feeding habits that they have inherited where else socials psychological theories can involve the constituents of the meals and the timing to enable beneficial aspects of the meal to benefit an individual (Gilovich et al., 2016).

The danger in relying on common sense or intuition in learning about the relationship between the individual and his or her environment is that it is not based on factual facts that can be tested like other scientific theories. These theories can be tested to prove their accuracy and allow modifications to be implemented to improve the accuracy of the theories (Gilovich et al., 2016). Common sense is also limited in providing explanations of phenomena, which is a disadvantage in learning about the environment as it keeps on changing and becoming more complex (Gilovich et al., 2016). Most other scientific theories have been researched and are conclusive in their provision of information regarding certain phenomena and can be modified to increase their accuracy (Gilovich et al., 2016).

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

References
Gilovich, T., Chen, S., Keltner, D., ; Nisbett, R. E. (2016). Social psychology. New York: W.W. Norton ; Company.